RELAZIONE SULLE DUE PROPOSTE DI PRO

RELAZIONE SULLE DUE PROPOSTE DI PROGETTO DELLE SCALE DI COLLEGAMENTO – giugno 2015


Spett.le Signor Hill,

insieme con la Società Paggetti Casa S.a.s., invio la presente relazione di massima per meglio evidenziare le caratteristiche progettuali dei lavori previsti a Borgo alla Collina, al fine da permetterle una più facile scelta.
In allegato troverà infatti due serie di disegni indicati con “Project # 1” e “Project # 2” (per i tre piani del fabbricato), indicanti le due soluzioni prospettate, oltre ad un disegno generale dello stato attuale “Current state”.

Sono inoltre allegati i disegni a corredo del computo metrico, con i richiami ai numeri delle voci del suddetto computo, per meglio evidenziare in pianta i vari lavori da effettuare.

In merito alle caratteristiche progettuali delle scale, per una sua migliore scelta, si ha:

- PROGETTO 1
Il progetto n° 1 è caratterizzato da 2 corpi di scale, uno a chiocciola per il collegamento tra il piano interrato e il piano terra, l’altro composto da una rampa in linea dal lato opposto della chiocciola.
Per la realizzazione delle suddette scale, sarà necessaria la demolizione di 2 bagni, quello al piano primo e uno dei bagni al piano terra. Inoltre, a causa di problematiche strutturali ed alla presenza delle tramezzature dei vari piani non allineate, la rampa di scale avrà una larghezza di circa 0,80 m., con alzate degli scalini e lunghezza degli stessi proprio ai limiti della comodità (circa come la scaletta esistente per il collegamento con la soffitta).
È possibile però allargare il locale soggiorno al piano terra, demolendo l’attuale tramezzo e ricostruendolo a fianco della rampa di scale, guadagnando circa 0,60 m. di spazio per tutta la lunghezza della rampa.
La scala a chiocciola non crea particolari problemi, a parte il logico ingombro quadrangolare all’interno della camera delle dimensioni di circa 1,50x1,50 metri.

- PROGETTO 2
Il progetto n° 2 è caratterizzato da 2 rampe di scale che si sovrappongono, che collegano “in linea” tutti i piani del fabbricato.
Strutturalmente i lavori sono simili, ma sicuramente semplificati dal non dover demolire i bagni, con tutti i sovrapprezzi che ne derivano.
La rampa di scale, con i relativi gradini viene più agevole, per la più semplice possibilità di posizionamento e di una larghezza adeguata, circa 0,90 – 1,00 metri.
Di contro andrà completamente perduta la camera al piano terra, dove si può comunque ricreare un ripostiglio/cabina armadio.
La nuova cucina al piano superiore sarà infine ridotta di circa 1 metro per tutta la lunghezza della parete (per una lunghezza quindi di circa 6,50 m.

- CONSIDERAZIONI:
Premetto che, come logico, entrambe le soluzioni hanno lati positivi e negativi.

A mio parere comunque la scelta progettuale che dovrete prendere va mediata sia in base alle vostre esigenze, ma anche considerando che avete un immobile sul mercato immobiliare italiano.

In detto mercato oggi è assolutamente impensabile costruire una casa nuova senza un almeno un bagno per ogni piano, con la scelta, quando ce ne è la possibilità di addirittura un bagno per ogni camera o quasi.
Il must infatti è avere un bellissimo ed enorme bagno (come quello che farete voi), ma dando la comodità del bagno quasi personale ad ogni occupante della casa, realizzando dei bagni di servizio, cosa invece opposta al progetto 1.
La mia seconda perplessità è data dalle dimensioni ridotte della scala di collegamento che mal si addicono all’importanza dell’intero complesso immobiliare.




La difficoltà di linguaggio ed il poco tempo non mi hanno permesso durante l’incontro di esternarvi quanto sopra, ma ritengo che la vostra scelta debba appunto essere consapevole del fatto che, oltre alle vostre necessità dovrete valutare il fatto di eseguire dei lavori che rendano il vostro immobile sempre più appetibile e con un plusvalore, nel mercato italiano, che, da quello che abbiamo visto ha caratteristiche diverse da quello che voi conoscete.

Detto questo, ritengo una parte del mio lavoro conclusa, e vi lascio alla vostra scelta, certo che adesso la potrete meglio valutare mettendo i vari pro e contro delle due soluzioni sul piatto della vostra bilancia.



PAGGETTI CASA S.A.S





FOGNANI ARCHITETTO LUCA

Risultati (Inglese) 1:

REPORT on TWO PROJECT PROPOSALS of the link – June 2015Dear. Mr Hill,together with Casa Paggetti society S.a.s, sending this report for better highlight the design features of the work envisaged in the Hill Village, in order to enable an easier choice.Enclosed you will find two series of drawings marked with "Project # 1" and "Project # 2" (for the three floors of the building), indicating the two proposed solutions, in addition to a general design current "Current state".The drawings are also attached with the metric calculation, with the calls to the numbers of the entries of the above calculation, to better highlight the various plant works to be carried out.About the design features of scales, for a better choice, you have:-1 PROJECTThe project n° 1 features 2 bodies of stairs, a staircase for the connection between the basement and the ground floor, the other consisting of a ramp in line on the opposite side of the nut.For the realization of these stairs, will require the demolition of 2 bathrooms, one on the first floor and one of the bathrooms on the ground floor. In addition, due to structural problems and the presence of various storey partitions are not aligned, the staircase will have a width of approximately 0.80 m, with risers of steps and length of the same right at the limits of comfort (about how the existing ladder for connection to the attic).However, you can enlarge stay local on the ground floor, demolishing the existing partitions and rebuilding the staircase, gaining approximately 0.60 m of space for the entire length of the ramp.The spiral staircase does not create special problems, aside from the logical quadrangular space inside the Chamber the size of about 1, 50x1 .50 meters.-2 PROJECTThe project n° 2 is characterized by 2 flights of stairs that overlap, which connect "online" all floors of the building. Structurally the work are similar, but simplified by not having to surely demolish the baths, with all surcharges arising therefrom.The staircase, with its stairs is easier, for easier positioning and possibilities of adequate width, about 0.90 1.00 m –.In contrast will be completely lost the ground-floor room, where you can still recreate a closet/wardrobe.The new kitchen upstairs will be reduced by about 1 meter for the entire length of the wall (so long about 6.50 m.-Considerations:I state that as logical, both solutions have positives and negatives.In my opinion, however, the design choice that you have to take both mediated goes according to your needs, but also considering that you have a property on Italian real estate market.In this market today is absolutely unthinkable to build a new home without at least one bathroom for each floor, with the choice, when there is the possibility of even a bathroom for each room or almost.The must is to have a beautiful and huge bathroom (like what do you), but giving the comfort of almost every personal bathroom occupant of the House, creating service baths, what opposed to 1 project instead.My second concern is given by the dimensions of the scale of that link are the importance of the entire complex.The language difficulties and the short time allowed me during the esternarvi meeting the above, but I believe that your choice must of course be aware that, in addition to your needs will have to evaluate the run of work that will make your property more attractive and always with a surplus value in Italian market, which, from what we've seen has different characteristics from what you know.That said, I believe a part of my job ended, and leave you to your choice, sure you can now better assess putting the various pros and cons of the two solutions on your balance.CASA PAGGETTI S.A.S FAZEEL ARCHITECT LUCA

Risultati (Inglese) 2:

REPORT ON THE TWO PROPOSED PROJECT OF SCALE CONNECTION - June 2015 Dear Mr. Hill, together with the Company Paggetti House Sas, sent this report in principle to better highlight the design features of the proposed works on the Hill Village, in order to enable an easier choice. Enclosed is in fact two series of drawings indicated with "Project # 1" and "Project # 2" (for the three floors of the building), indicating the two proposed solutions, in addition to a general design of the current state "Current state". They are also accompanied by the drawings accompanying the bill of quantities, with bullets to the numbers of the items of that calculation, to better highlight the various work plan to be carried out. With regard to the design characteristics of the stairs, to his best choice, we have: - PROJECT 1 Project No. 1 is characterized by two bodies of stairs, a spiral for connection between the basement and the ground floor, the other consisting of a ramp in line on the opposite side of the nut . To carry out the above steps, it will be necessary to demolish two bathrooms, one on the first floor and one of the bathrooms on the ground floor. Moreover, due to structural problems and the presence of partition walls of the various planes are not aligned, the flight of stairs will have a width of about 0.80 m., With risers of the steps and of the same length to the limits of their own convenience (about how the ladder exists for the connection to the attic). You can, however, expand the local living on the ground floor, demolishing and reconstructing the current partition next to the flight of stairs, earning about 0.60 m. of space for the whole length of the ramp. The spiral staircase does not create particular problems, apart from the logical footprint quadrangular within the chamber about the size of 1,50x1,50 meters. - PROJECT 2 The project n ° 2 is characterized 2 flights of stairs that overlap, linking "online" all floors of the building. Structurally, the work is similar, but certainly simplified by not having to demolish the bathrooms, with all surcharges that come with it. The flight of stairs, with its steps is easier, for the simplest possibility of positioning and a proper width, about 0.90 to 1.00 meters. In contrast will completely lost the ground floor room, where you can still create a closet / walk-in closet. The new kitchen to the upper floor will finally be reduced to about 1 meter along the length of the wall (for a length therefore approximately 6.50 m. - CONSIDERATIONS: I state that as logical, both solutions have positives and negative. In my opinion, however, the design choice that you have to take to be mediated is tailored to your needs, but even considering that you have a property on the Italian real estate market. In this market today is absolutely impossible to build a new house without a bath for at least one each floor, with the choice, when there is the possibility of even a bathroom for each room, or almost. The fact is must to have a beautiful and huge bathroom (like the one you will do), but giving comfort to the bathroom almost personnel each occupant of the house, making the service bathrooms, what instead opposed the plan 1. My second concern is the size of the reduced scale of connection that is ill-suited to the importance of the entire building complex. The difficulty of language and recently they were not allowed during the meeting of esternarvi the above, but I think your choice is to just be aware that, in addition to your needs you will have to evaluate the fact of starting work that will make your property more attractive and with a surplus, on the Italian market, which, from what we've seen has different characteristics from the one you know. That said, I think a part of my work ended, and I leave you to your choice, of course now you can better assess putting the various pros and cons of the two solutions on the plate of your balance. Paggetti CASA SAS Fognani ARCHITECT LUCA

Risultati (Inglese) 3:

REPORT ON THE TWO PROJECT PROPOSALS OF THE STAIRWAYS OF CONNECTION - june 2015


Dear Mr Hill,

together with the Company Paggetti Casa S. a.s. , sending the present relation of maximum to better highlight the design characteristics of the work provided for a village on the hill, in order to enable an easier choice.